The purpose of The New Atlantis is to offer clarity and guidance at a moment when people seem to be losing confidence in one of the pillars of modern civilization. The New Atlantis hopes to help everyone — as citizens, scientists, policymakers, and human beings — to deal more wisely and more creatively with both the burdens and the blessings of modern science and technology.

Dystopian dread is the shadow of utopian dreams. The hope of The New Atlantis is to help steer away from both — and instead toward a culture in which science and technology work for, not on, human beings. The New Atlantis fosters a richer discourse about science and technology, one that is not limited to categories like autonomy, privacy, rights, corporate misbehavior, and disparate impact, but that also addresses perennial yet pressing concerns about dignity, degradation, the obligations between generations, the nature of the good life, and meaning and purpose.

The New Atlantis is not an academic journal but a public journal of ideas. The journal aims to provide an alternative to the models of experts and academics whose writing is aimed mainly at each other, and of short-form or “explainer” journalism that often fails to engage the deeper questions at stake. Instead, The New Atlantis publishes long-form essays, articles, and reports that are written with insight, accessibility, literary virtuosity, and factual reliability for lay audiences and scholars alike. The editors and authors are scientists, medical doctors, engineers, policy analysts, academics, writers, and scholars.

The New Atlantis is a nonpartisan publication. The subjects addressed in its pages often cut across existing political lines, forcing liberals and conservatives, progressives and libertarians, to revisit their guiding principles.

SELECT CONTENTS:

Joseph Lawler
     “Mass. Exodus”
Thomas Hochman
     “Will Anyone Vote for Abundance?”
Aidan Mackenzie
     “If We Can Do It in Baltimore . . .”

read more . . .


Partner Features shared with Mars Hill Audio

Mickey Craig & Jon Fennell: “Love in the Age of Neuroscience”

Mickey Craig & Jon Fennell: “Love in the Age of Neuroscience”

January 22, 2009
Mickey Craig and Jon Fennell argue that sexual confusion is a symptom of a larger crisis prominently explored in Tom Wolfe’s novel, I Am Charlotte Simmons. (38 minutes)
Christine Rosen: “Virtual Friendship and the New Narcissism”

Christine Rosen: “Virtual Friendship and the New Narcissism”

August 6, 2008
Christine Rosen examines how social networking is changing the shape of relationships for millions of Americans, and affecting our understanding and experience of friendship. (50 minutes)
Caitrin Nicol: “Brave New World at 75”

Caitrin Nicol: “Brave New World at 75”

August 18, 2007
Caitrin Nicol combines a survey of contemporary review of Brave New World with thoughtful reflections on happiness and freedom. (43 minutes)
Yuval Levin: “The Moral Challenge of Modern Science”

Yuval Levin: “The Moral Challenge of Modern Science”

January 30, 2007
Yuval Levin calls for a more deliberate awareness of how science shapes how we ask and answer moral questions together. (44 minutes)
Matthew B. Crawford: “Shop Class as Soulcraft”

Matthew B. Crawford: “Shop Class as Soulcraft”

September 12, 2006
Matthew B. Crawford makes the case for the manual trades as an expression of human flourishing. (55 minutes)