released 1/10/2025

Given recent legal developments in the UK, Canada, and elsewhere regarding assisted suicide, we present two interviews from Volume 61 of the Journal focused on the “right to die” movement. First, Ian Dowbiggin explains how the modern “right to die” movement emerged from late 19th-century ideas grounded in positivism, social Darwinism, and utilitarianism. Those ideas provided a basis of “philosophical kinship” among groups supportive of eugenics, birth control, abortion rights, and euthanasia. Dowbiggin describes a more recent “crisis of confidence” in those ideas, however, and a greater focus on personal autonomy as the key factor in support for a person’s “right to die.” Dowbiggin is the author of A Merciful End: The Euthanasia Movement in Modern America.

Then, Arthur J. Dyck examines the moral and legal case against physician-assisted suicide. He explains why the same moral framework that prohibits homicide also prohibits euthanasia and how euthanasia and assisted suicide fundamentally oppose affirmations of the value of human life. Dyck argues that our natural inhibitions against killing and for nurturing life should not be suppressed or rationalized away, and that when we do so we do great societal harm. He concludes with a powerful analysis of the inherent and possible goods of choosing comfort-only care at the end of life, versus assisted suicide—goods that nurture and preserve our humanity up to the end. Dyck is the author of Life’s Worth: The Case against Assisted Suicide.

27 minutes

PREVIEW

The player for the full version of this Feature is only available to current members. If you have an active membership, log in here. If you’d like to become a member — with access to all our audio programs — sign up here.

Related reading and listening