“Thomas Aquinas’s neighbors and colleagues were not — like ours — religiously diverse outsiders but members of religious orders, priests, and lay Christians. Jews were the most exotic non-Christians Thomas encountered. In all likelihood, he never so much as met a Muslim. He can just imagine an atheist. Perhaps this very absence of pressure, this lack of impinging, pervasive pluralism, freed him to think through the challenge of pagan virtue with the kind of patient, exhaustive care its complexity and importance demand. Yet, notwithstanding the relative uniformity of the world he inhabited, he held as dear friend and treasured conversation partner a long-dead but, to him, very present Greek pagan, a religious outsider in a very deep sense indeed. He defended the Philosopher, as he affectionately called him, against charges of irrationality brought even by fellow friars, cited him more frequently than any figure save Augustine, and offered more commentary on his work than on any one or any thing but the Bible. And, whatever else it is, his magnum opus represents an extended and embodied effort to welcome that outsider and his virtue in a way that simultaneously honors and imitates the Triune God. In Thomas Aquinas, we have to do with a welcome of pagan virtue that is as generous and deep as it is faithful and true. That, at least, is my claim.

“At its core, then, this book attempts to elucidate Thomas Aquinas’s complex conception of pagan virtue-to explain just what that vision is and how it relates to both the substance of his ethics and his very way of doing moral theology. . . .

“As Thomas’s synthesis is usually understood, he chooses, at each step, between Augustinian and Aristotelian traditions. At best, it’s a synthesis of averages, of alternating either/or’s reaching a rough balance. Perhaps nowhere is this more evident than when it comes to pagan virtue, where, on nearly every account, honoring Aristotle and reason, he welcomes it, or, keeping faith with Augustine and Christ, he rejects it. What he does not do — or even try to do — is honor insider and outsider, Bishop and Philosopher, alike.

“On the dominant paradigms — for Thomas’s stance on pagan virtue, his synthesis, and his contemporary significance — he and those who would follow must choose: Augustine or Aristotle, truth or welcome, particularity or public reason. These paradigms of competition, I argue, not only misunderstand Thomas but miss the ethos he would bequeath us. Thomas welcomes pagan virtue for charity’s sake, not against but because of his Christian convictions, construing pagan virtue itself as the outworking of God’s gift-and its recognition as one more instance of giving God the glory he is due. That commitment to charity shapes not just his conclusions but his way of doing moral theology, and more his very life.

“Charity’s scholarly mode is the multiplication of distinctions in order to preserve truth and honor its inevitably broken seekers-among whom, for Thomas at least, Aristotle ranks near the top. Just where choice between traditions appears inevitable, he finds a way to honor the Philosopher’s insights without compromising Christian fidelity. When theological commitments seem to condemn Aristotle, Thomas seeks, in and for charity, redemption. And where Christian or pagan falls short of truth or justice, and charity would be betrayed by his doing otherwise, he offers fraternal correction. Impelled by commitment to Christ, Thomas strives to be Aristotelian by being Augustinian and vice versa, his very engagement with Aristotle performing the capacious stance he commends, his theologizing enacting the welcome he prescribes.

“For all of us, Christian and non-Christian alike, Thomas offers a way to grapple with the challenge of difference without betraying our deepest convictions. And for Christians, at least, he models a particular way of doing ethics and being in the world that is at once generous and faithful, hopeful and committed, patterned after God’s way with us. Call this stance prophetic Thomism. It sees distinction-drawing, precision, and fidelity as linked arm-in-arm with resistance to domination, critique of empire, and pursuit of the common good. For prophetic Thomism, multiplying distinctions is no rival to the work of justice but a face thereof, enabling the recognition and condemnation of evil and the construction of justice-oriented alliances across lines of difference. Where there is ambiguity in Thomas’s work, it opts for a justice in keeping with the best of his thought, and where he falls into error, it corrects, following Thomas’s own way with what he found wanting.

“If Christian ethics frequently takes tradition and liberation, conceptual analysis and prophetic concern, orthodoxy and inclusion as either/or alternatives — even competing scholarly identities — prophetic Thomism seeks to unite and transform. In both the substance of Thomas’s welcome and his way of doing ethics, we glimpse prophetic Thomism at work.”

— from David Decosimo, Ethics as a Work of Charity: Thomas Aquinas and Pagan Virtue (Stanford University Press, 2014)

Related reading and listening