“Metaphysics is the master science in the theoretical order because it studies the most fundamental and comprehensive object there is, namely, being qua being. Politics, by analogy, is the master science in the practical order because it concerns what we might describe as the most comprehensive sphere of human existence. As Aristotle explains in the opening sentences of the Politics:

“Every city (πόλιν) is a community (κοινωνίαν) of some kind, and every community is established with a view to some good. But, if all communities aim at some good, the state or political community, which is the highest of all, and which embraces all the rest (πάσας περιέχουσα τὰς ἄλλας), aims at good in a greater degree than any other, and at the highest good.

“Just as human action aims inevitably at some good, so too the ordered inter-action of human beings, to the extent that it is indeed the inter-related actions of individual human beings (and not just an accidental coincidence of discrete acts), aims at a common good. The different kinds of communities, then, are specified by the different aspects of the human good they are meant to realize in common. Now, just as the characterization of the variety of sciences as the study of being in a certain respect leads to the need for a science of being as such and not only in a certain limited respect, so too does the characterization of human community as ordered to the good in a certain respect lead to the need for a human community ordered to the good as such, without specifying qualification, the whole human good. Aquinas brings out even more strongly the completeness of the good that defines politics: ‘If every society is ordered to a good, that society which is the highest necessarily seeks in the highest degree the good that is the highest among all human goods . . . and so political society is itself the highest society.’ This complete human community is what Aristotle calls the city, the ‘polis’ — which is sometimes translated in this context into English as ‘the state’ or the ‘city-state,’ because we naturally think of a city, not so much as a supreme political entity unto itself (in spite of the fact that the very word ‘politics’ means, literally, ‘city matters’), but as a part of a larger unity, typically the nation.

“This ambiguity, the difficulty that presents itself in translating the term ‘polis,’ deserves attention. We tend to distinguish between ‘city’ and ‘state’ principally in quantitative terms. But the crucial consideration regarding completeness or perfection for Aristotle is not the size of the political unity or community, but its status in the order of goodness. Specifically, the crucial point is its comprehensiveness, its capacity to include within itself the ends pursued by other societies, such as the household or the village — indeed, in a manner that we will have to specify below, also the society of the Church. Before addressing that, let us speculatively deepen the point about what precisely defines what Aquinas calls the ‘most perfect’ (perfectissima) society of the city. Human beings cannot but pursue what they take to be good, both in each discrete action and in their lives as a whole, so that an individual life can be taken to be an interpretation, whether conscious and deliberate or not, of what the human good is. The organization of human life in a community, beyond the regulation of discrete actions, or, in other words, a city, is thus inevitably itself a particular interpretation of the highest human good. Just as one cannot study any particular science, understood as a study of being in a particular respect, without (however unconsciously) taking for granted or implying a metaphysics, that is, an interpretation of the meaning of being as such, so too one cannot have a human community that is not an interpretation of the human good, as such. Whatever human community thus sets the ultimate horizon for the unfolding of human life, that community is the one properly designated as the polis.”

— from D. C. Schindler, God and the City: An Essay in Political Metaphysics (St. Augustine’s Press, 2023). Dr. Schindler discussed this book on Volume 160 of the Journal.

Related reading and listening

  • The gift of meaningful work — In this lecture, D. C. Schindler argues that genuine work is inherently meaningful and facilitates an encounter with reality and therefore, ultimately, with God. (36 minutes)
  • The political wisdom of Edmund Burke —
    FROM VOL. 28
    Daniel Ritchie discusses the enduring political wisdom of British statesman and political thinker Edmund Burke (1729–1797). (13 minutes)
  • “A society of friends at work” — Political philosopher Andrew Willard Jones lays out a robust vision for a just society in which virtues are formed in an analogical manner through relational obedience and trust. (71 minutes)
  • Is liberalism compatible with religious freedom? — D. C. Schindler relies on two Thomistic axioms to illustrate why liberalism — which claims to offer a minimalist conception of the common good — is ultimately incompatible with a Catholic understanding of religious freedom. (34 minutes)
  • Prudence in politics —
    FROM VOL. 146
    Henry T. Edmondson, III talks about Flannery O’Connor’s understanding of political life, which was influenced by a range of thinkers including Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Eric Voegelin, and Russell Kirk. (19 minutes)
  • Friendship and life together — In a lecture at Providence College, Ken Myers explores how the concept of friendship, which used to be central to political philosophy, was banished from considerations of public life as the state was exalted over society. (53 minutes)
  • In the image of our devices? — In light of the history of the meaning of intellectus, D. C. Schindler questions the use of the word “intelligence” to describe systems employing large language models. (18 minutes)
  • Mars Hill Audio Journal, Volume 160 — FEATURED GUESTS: Jessica Hooten Wilson, Kyle Hughes, Gil Bailie, D. C. Schindler, Paul Tyson, and Holly Ordway
  • Why kings are compelling — Historian Francis Oakley describes how the modern idea of “secular” politics is a striking departure in human history. (32 minutes)
  • Put not your trust in tyrants — Andrew Willard Jones contrasts the pre-modern understanding of political power with the modern view. (46 minutes)
  • Justice and truth — Joseph Ratzinger: “Plato’s philosophy is utterly misconceived when he is presented as an individualistic, dualistic thinker who negates what is earthly and advocates a flight into the beyond.”
  • Schindler, D. C. — FROM THE GUEST PAGE: Dr. Schindler’s work sheds light on contemporary cultural challenges by drawing on the resources of the classical Christian tradition.
  • The Symbol of Authority — In the second of two lectures given by D. C. Schindler, he explores the nature of authority with reference to the transcendental dance of Truth, Goodness, and Beauty. (60 minutes)
  • The Authority of the Symbol — In this lecture presented at the CiRCE Institute national conference, D. C. Schindler presents a metaphysical description of what symbols are. (54 Minutes)
  • Challenging the “gospel of democracy” — Robert Kraynak argues that assumptions many modern Christians hold about liberal democracy are rooted in some false ideas about the nature and purpose of civil government. (46 minutes)
  • Freedom, real and counterfeit — D. C. Schindler contrasts the classical and Christian understanding of freedom with the modern understanding of freedom, and explains how true freedom is a condition of harmony with reality. (59 minutes)
  • Mars Hill Audio Journal, Volume 154 — FEATURED GUESTS: Felicia Wu Song, Michael Ward, Norman Wirzba, Carl Trueman, D. C. Schindler, and Kerry McCarthy
  • Social media is hate speech — D. C. Schindler argues that much modern speech effectively expresses contempt for that which language (and reason) have been given to us: Truth. (33 minutes)
  • Freedom, ancient and modern — In a brief excerpt from David Bentley Hart’s book Atheist Delusions, and a longer excerpt from an Areopagus Lecture by D. C. Schindler, the modern view of freedom is contrasted with the understanding of freedom present in ancient Hebrew, Greek, and Roman thought. (27 minutes)
  • Mars Hill Audio Journal, Volume 147 — FEATURED GUESTS: R. Jared Staudt, Jason Peters, D. C. Schindler, Craig Gay, Mary Hirschfeld, and Patrick Samway
  • Perceiving the common good during a pandemic — D. C. Schindler reflects on the shape of our way of life in wake of a killer virus, seeing signs both encouraging and sinister. (35 minutes)
  • D. C. Schindler: “For Freedom Set Free” — D. C. Schindler argues that the Christian notion of religious liberty is a synthesis of the Jewish, Roman, and Greek traditions. (61 minutes)
  • D. C. Schindler on Robert Spaemann — On this Friday Feature, Ken Myers talks with philosopher D. C. Schindler about philosopher Robert Spaemann’s work in general and his defense of anthropomorphism in particular. (14 minutes)
  • The nature of freedom reconsidered — In anticipation of this Fall’s Areopagus Lecture entitled “‘For Freedom Set Free’: Retrieving Genuine Religious Liberty,” we present selections from interviews with three MARS HILL AUDIO guests who have raised questions about the modern understanding of freedom. (27 minutes)
  • Recovering the meaning of reason — James Peters discusses how Plato, Aristotle, Augustine, Pascal, and many others understood the nature and purpose of reason quite differently from the common modern understanding. Also, D. C. Schindler explains how consciousness and reason necessarily involve reaching outside of ourselves. (24 minutes)
  • Mars Hill Audio Journal, Volume 142 — FEATURED GUESTS: Stanley Hauerwas, Perry L. Glanzer, Nathan F. Alleman, Jeffrey Bishop, Alan Jacobs, D. C. Schindler, and Marianne Wright
  • Mars Hill Audio Journal, Volume 132 — FEATURED GUESTS: David I. Smith, Susan Felch, D. C. Schindler, Malcolm Guite, and J. A. C. Redford
  • From a-rational faith to meaningless world — D. C. Schindler on how faith detached from reason guarantees relativism
  • In defense of unity — Peter J. Leithart on the relationship between ecclesial unity and religious liberty
  • Mars Hill Audio Journal, Volume 130 — FEATURED GUESTS: Jacob Silverman, Carson Holloway, Joseph Atkinson, Greg Peters, Antonio López, and Julian Johnson
  • What is beyond our choosing? — D. C. Schindler on our nihilistic quest for freedom
  • Keeping “the good” in the common good — D. C. Schindler on the metaphysical character of real community
  • The problem with patriotism in secular democracies — Alasdair MacIntyre on the systematic rejection of the tradition of the virtues in modern political institutions
  • True transcendence, true immanence — D. C. Schindler on how believers can be practical atheists
  • Mars Hill Audio Journal, Volume 120 — FEATURED GUESTS: Douglas Rushkoff, Phillip Thompson, Jonathan Wilson, James Bratt, D. C. Schindler, and Paul Elie
  • Mars Hill Audio Journal, Volume 91 — FEATURED GUESTS: John Witte, Jr., Hugh Brogan, Daniel Ritchie, Daniel Walker Howe, George McKenna, and Patrick Deneen
  • Richard Sherlock: “The Secret of Straussianism” — Richard Sherlock explores the significance of political philosopher Leo Strauss’s methodology, focusing on how he understood the communication of ideas in classical and modern thought about political order. (36 minutes)
  • Mars Hill Audio Journal, Volume 71 — FEATURED GUESTS: Peter Augustine Lawler, David Koyzis, Roger Lundin, Craig Gay, Steven Rhoads, and R. Larry Todd
Tags: